| EPA-CARIFORUM DEAL HAS IMPLICATIONS FOR
REVENUE GENERATION
By Lesroy W. Williams
Observer Reporter
(Basseterre, St. Kitts) - Minister of International
Trade, Dr. the Hon. Timothy Harris, in an interview
with The St. Kitts-Nevis Observer, said that the Economic
Partnership Agreement (EPA) between the European Union
and CARIFORUM (Caricom and the Dominican Republic)
has serious implications for revenue generation in
the Federation of St. Kitts and Nevis.
The trade minister said that a significant portion
of the governments revenue about 50 percent
- comes from tariffs on imported goods, the trade
minister said.
The trade ministers remarks come just days
before heads of Caricom States are expected to meet
in Barbados on September 10 at a meeting convened
by Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer, Chairman of Caricom,
to discuss imbalances and irregularities with the
EPA-CARIFORUM deal before deciding to affix their
signatures.
Economic Partnership Agreements are a scheme to create
a free trade area between the European Union and countries
from the African Caribbean Pacific (ACP) territories.
They are a response to continuing criticism than non-reciprocal
and discriminating preferential trade agreements offered
by the EU are incompatible with World Trade Organization
(WTO) rules.
Due to the WTO incompatibility of previous arrangements,
the EPAs key feature is their reciprocity and
non-discriminatory nature.
Given the situation that the EPA-CARIFORUM deal creates
a free trade zone between both parties, Dr. Harris
emphasized that the government will have to create
other avenues for revenue generation. One of those
avenues might be the introduction of a value added
tax (VAT) to goods. However, this is one of the issues
that is being discussed at the present moment, he
said.
Some Caricom leaders have been split on the EPA and
are reneging on their pledge to sign the agreement
over concerns they have with respect to imbalance
in the trading deal.
Dr. Harris was asked, what does St. Kitts have to
export to Europe and who stands the most to benefit
from the EPA-CARIFORUM trading deal?
Dr. Harris said that the EPA as a new arrangement
encompasses more than trade and that it was intended
to contribute to the development of the region and
to promote regional integration.
Sugar was the mainstay of the St. Kitts economy until
the 1970s. St. Kitts and Nevis no longer export
sugar to Europe. The Federation now longer has a sugar
industry; it was closed in 2005 because of heavy losses
for years.
The government has embarked on a program to diversify
the agricultural sector and to stimulate other sectors
of the economy.
Activities such as tourism and offshore banking have
assumed larger roles in the economy. Tourism revenues
are now the chief source of the islands foreign exchange.
One major concern with the EPA has been that the
Caribbean region is made up of small open economies
that are heavily reliant on tourism and the offshore
sector to generate foreign exchange. This heavy dependence
on the developed world to support Caribbean economies
makes the business of negotiating economic partnership
agreements a risky business. This is so because there
is an imbalance in power; the developed countries
stand more to benefit because they are much more economically
powerful, which puts them in an advantageous position.
Prime Minister Denzil Douglas recently said that
there are opportunities to be gained from signing
the EPA and therefore his cabinet has taken the decision
to sign.
Our people would now have access to the European
Market in a way that they didnt have before
and so if we are able to enter into that market and
provide the necessary services, goods et cetera, then
we can benefit, Dr. Douglas said.
Dr. Harris stated that the EPA came about as a new
arrangement and a successor arrangement to the Lome
Convention which came into force in April 1976.
The Lome Convention was designed to provide a new
framework of cooperation between the European Community
and developing ACP countries. It had two main aspects.
It provided for most ACP agricultural and mineral
exports to enter the EC free of duty. Preferential
access based on a quota system was agreed for products
such as sugar and beef, in competition with EC agriculture.
Secondly, the EC committed ECU 3 billion for aid and
investment in the ACP countries.
The emergence of the single European Market at the
end of 1992 affected ACP preferential access to EU
markets. For example, many Caribbean countries feared
that their bananas would no longer have access to
the European Market but that cheaper bananas from
Latin America would gain access.
It became clear to the European Union in the
context of World Trade Organization (WTO) rules that
the Lome arrangement was not consistent with the new
trading regime of liberalized trade. It was not consistent
from the point that the Lome arrangement provided
a one way preferential access for products from the
ACP region into the European Market and by and large
the new rule said that there must be reciprocity,
Dr. Harris said.
It was because of the non-reciprocity and discriminatory
nature of the LOME agreement which was not compatible
with WTO rules that brought it to an end in 2000 with
LOME IV.
After Lome IV, a new trading arrangement came into
being called the Cotonou agreement which promised
that ACP states would continue to enjoy virtually
free access to European markets and there will be
regional free trade agreements between the EU and
better-off developing countries.
However, the Cotonou agreement has been criticized
for moving from partnership to excessive and unhelpful
conditionality upon ACP countries. The ACP countries
the Lomé Convention initially helped were economically
hindered as the Cotonou Agreement was not particularly
advantageous to the ACP countries.
Dr. Harris said that the EPA as a new arrangement
was never meant to be a replica of the Lome agreement.
Although there are imperfections in the EPA-CARIFORUM
agreement, Dr. Harris feels that they can be ironed
out with time.
NB: Some information sourced from Wikipedia Encyclopedia.
|