| LONG ON PROJECTS SHORT ON VISION
By Tim Caines
By reading the title of this piece you may have surmised
that it is a critique. It is constructive and offered
only because I am certain that we, as Nevisians, can
and must do better. Looking back there are many projects
and programs that we can point out with pride. What
is not so easy however, is asserting that over the
years we have maximized the opportunities for greatest
economic advantage in consideration of the projects
and programs that we have put in place. Let us look
at two for illustration purposes:
Infrastructure
Specifically Road Construction
And Repair.
Since independence we have been building and rebuilding
roads. Yet after twenty-five years of incessant roadwork
and miles and miles of concrete and asphalt being
laid throughout, we find ourselves still having to
contract foreign companies to construct. If practice
indeed makes perfect, we should have been experts
in road construction by now.
Had we invested in developing the expertise using
as a catalyst the various road projects, we could
now have been paying the tens of millions (maybe hundreds
of millions before all is said and done), to a Nevisian
company. All it would have taken initially was having
one of our engineers understudy the head engineer
of the foreign company hired when the first phase
of the road work began.
What makes it even more depressing is that we have
what it takes to establish a company of that nature.
We have an asphalt plant, a public works division,
and professional and civil engineers at home and abroad.
How difficult would it be? Not very. There is a current
and continuing need for the expertise.
Our government owns equipment that can be sold to
the new company, and concessions can be given for
new equipment and vehicles (as is the case with foreign
companies). There is a somewhat knowledgeable workforce.
Those persons currently employed in Public Works filling
the potholes can be shifted to the new company where
they can be further trained and better paid.
Not only would this move provide some funds for our
treasury in the sale of the plant and equipment, but
it would also permanently reduce our recurrent expenditure.
The result? We develop exportable expertise, we create
jobs as opposed to work, while decreasing the cost
to government. Most importantly, however, is that
the millions we are pouring into roads, (now and future),
stays in our economy.
Coincidentally, similar can, (and should), be done
in the other areas of Public Works, and the production
division of the Agriculture Department. Government
should be in support of private enterprise, not in
competition with it. Private enterprise improves quality,
increases efficiencies and expands economies.
Healthcare (Assistance With
Critical/Catastrophic Illness)
For years we have been flying our citizens to other
countries whenever they are afflicted with anything
more that a cold. Our hospital was recently upgraded
and expanded but undeniably patients with major illnesses
or requiring major surgery have to be taken elsewhere.
More recently still we have made (are making) arrangements
with Cuba to treat our citizens at reduce costs.
Now this is all well and good, but again it is not
a long term solution to our health care program nor
are we fully capitalizing on the opportunities. We
have doctors practicing and specializing all over
the world. You might well travel to Cuba and be tended
by a Nevisian. Why not make the investment now and
build a modern, state of the art medical facility
that can fully meet our needs and afford our doctors
that same opportunity to practice and specialize at
home. Then have the Cubans, (as their assistance),
rotate their doctors in, working with our more experienced
practitioners that we bring home as we develop the
expertise our interns.
In doing this we reduce the cost of treatment to
our citizens. Notwithstanding that the cost of treatment
in Cuba is reduced, it is not free and the treatment
center would be able to cover its cost. Additionally
the patient and/or family must meet the cost of airfare,
lodging, food, and transport in Cuba. Also to be dealt
with is the cultural differences and the language
barrier. Building and operating our own facility eliminates
all these, provides more opportunities, and keeps
more money in the island to be recycled and compounded
in our economy.
Additionally we develop the expertise over time,
yielding economic benefits. A modern facility with
matching expertise would encourage more persons to
return home; some for the career opportunities, some
knowing that they can be taken care of if the worse
should happen. One of the stagnates to our economic
growth is the miniscule increase in population caused
by the continued hemorrhaging of persons from the
island, mostly the professionals we so desperately
need.
Also the center has the potential to become an economic
driver. Most of the English-speaking Caribbean is
now traveling to Cuba for treatment of catastrophic
illnesses. The Cubans are not offering their services
at reduced rates simply for the sake of being nice.
They know that when we come we stay in their hotels
and guest houses, we eat at their restaurants, and
we ride their taxis
all generating economic
activity past the employment of doctors and nurses.
If we build like facilities and develop the expertise,
is it not reasonable to assume that we would attract
much of this business considering Nevis is easier
and cheaper to get to for most if not all of the islands;
and that the language, culture and lifestyle is similar?
Besides, happens if/when communism falls in Cuba and
capitalism brings the costs there in line with the
rest of the world?
We must be persistently cognizant that no project
or program works in a vacuum. Other aspects of our
economy and/or society are always affected. With each
we must grasp the opportunities presented for our
collective intellectual, professional, social and
economic development. To do this however, we must
contend with three major obstacles that keeps us from
thinking cohesively about our collective and perpetual
development.
First is our lack of entrepreneurial spirit. Too
many of us, given a choice, would rather be the PS
in the Ministry of Works, earning a guaranteed seven
or eight thousand monthly, than jump at the chance
to make millions by starting and owning the company
contracted by that same Ministry to do the work. The
rationale, as one person put it: ... a sure
salary at the end of the month.
Working in ownership capacity as plumbers, technicians,
masons, retailers etc., we see it as a job and not
a business. No real plan for growth or expansion.
As one foreign business owner living here once told
me: Nevisians dont open businesses, they
open shops. That reality why others can come
to Nevis, borrow our money from our banks, and open
businesses that employ us, as we create wealth for
them.
While we cannot all be entrepreneurs, more of us
need to take that initiative, and in the types of
businesses that determine our economic destiny. Like
it or not, we live in an ownership society, and those
who controls the money control the entity whether
it be a family, a business, or a country.
Second is our envious competition with, and/or non
support of each other. There is a crab in a
barrel mentality that permeates our society
that is strangling our social and economic progress.
For whatever reason we do not like to see anyone else
get ahead, whether it be that they are leaving us
behind, or catching up to us.
Consider this: I made the suggestion to a few persons
we should assist Nevisian civil engineers in establishing
a company capable of building and repairing our roads.
After agreeing to the benefits outlined above most
commented, (in various forms):
but you
know they wont want to see a Nevisian get all
that money. Sad, but true.
I cant recall how many times I have personally
heard and been told of comments like
me nar give dem deh me money or a deh
me money a go; and persons actually stop supporting
local businesses. Why? Because after toiling for years,
(or projected earnings), that owner can afford a nicer
car or built a comfortable house. Yet those same persons
have no problem spending that same money with wealthy
foreigners. That is precisely why most of the major
drivers of our economy are foreign owned. Why foreign
owned businesses thrive while domestic owned struggle
or fail.
Thirdly we need to value our professionals, respect
their achievements, and appreciate that they as trained,
as talented, as capable as the ones we ordinarily
import. We must give them every first preference for
employment. Time and again Directorship, General Manager,
Department Head positions are filled by foreign workers,
despite the fact we have qualified, capable persons
here and abroad. It seems like any person who steps
off a plane with a briefcase is an expert, provided
of course that he did not grow up here. Yet Nevisians,
as or better qualified, are not consulted or contracted
because they are still seen as the little boy or girl
from such and such village; or they are family to
such and such. And if by some happenstance the position
is given to a Nevisian, he/she is paid minimally,
while the non national who previously (or subsequently)
hold the position is paid twice as much (or more),
plus housing and travel allowances. What does it say
when we have doctors, lawyers, engineers, accountants,
business professionals, educators etc from various
countries, yet ours are scattered the world over,
choosing not to come home.
To reach closer to our truest potential we must change
our mindset. We must realize that every challenge
also presents opportunities; opportunities
for us to develop our own people and expertise. Only
by capitalizing fully on these opportunities, in support
of each other, can we expedite our progress as a people.
If we do not, we will continue being the employed,
rather than the employers in our own land, and continue
to have two major exports: wealth and human capital
(brain power).
|