| ECONOMIC CRISIS PART 1
For the past decade we have enjoyed a thriving global
economy and St. Kittts-Nevis has been a direct recipient
of a strong U.S. dollar. The American economy which
supports the global market has seen its worst economic
downturn since the 1930s Great Depression. The world
market is in dire crisis and our homeland, which is
directly related to tourism, is adversely affected.
Economists and other financial experts are currently
debating the direct effect of a government stimulus
package that should in theory put a jolt of life into
the U.S. economy and subsequently the rest of the
world.
As we battle with our own questions surrounding the
stability of the St. Kitts and Nevis economy, we need
to first understand the impact of certain world events
on our home front. America has reported the loss of
over three million jobs since the downturn began.
A total of over three hundred thousand jobs were sacrificed
only in the month of January.
Of this amount, 217,000 of these jobs were from cost
saving techniques in the manufacturing industry and
over 100,000 in the service industry. A further analysis
implies that an average of 10,000 American jobs have
been lost per day, with more job cuts forecasted for
the coming months.
How does this affect our Federation, one may ask?
Our primary source of support is driven by the tourism
industry, which in turn supports the government and
private sectors which includes banks and other major
companies such as TDC, Horsfords, etc.
Everything being constant, January and February are
very heavy traffic months for our tourism industry
as many individuals are trying to beat the cold weather
thus coming to places such as ours. The present circumstances,
however, leave vacationers reluctant to spend an additional
dollar on luxury items such as vacations as the opportunity
cost of such activities far outweighs the benefit
associated with feeding the family and likewise keeping
a heated winter roof over ones head.
Without the influx of this cash, our Federation will
likely inherit a domino effect of job cuts as a direct
result of the stagnant world economy.
The implications of a worldwide contracting personal
income have already impacted many. My analysis on
forecasted hotel sales found drastic declines as compared
to prior years. The widespread repercussion follows,
as half of our countrys labor force which is
supported by the tourism industry (Nevis in this instance)
becomes unable to make deposits into banks; the banks
in turn suffer decreases in quarterly profits which
is as a result of little operating revenue needed
to sustain the current level of administrative and
other general expenses that may encompass operating
cost. The domino effect continues as our booming construction
industry will suffer as local residents who have lost
their jobs will be forced to put such development
on hold.
In contrast, the construction sector in Nevis that
caters to the international community will also be
affected, as most of the wealthy international customers
who had been adversely affected by billions of dollars
of lost income in the global banking crisis will also
be forced to abandon plans of having a second or third
vacation home in the tropical climate.
It is imperative that accredited investors such as
banking institutions and other sophisticated investors
who hold investment for speculative purposes be very
cautious with over leveraging on financial investments.
We need to remember that part of the reason that many
of the banks in the United States have and continue
to fail is as a result of overpriced real estate that
the banks had given loans to.
Further, an analysis of the government sector indicates
that as current and future revenue streams decrease
as a result of reductions in imports and other taxing
agents that are necessary to sustain public services,
many of the services attained through government aides
will either be reduced or completely eliminated.
My recommendations (see my complete government recommendations
with complete data analysis in the next month issue
of the continuation of this article called Economic
Crisis Part II) are not intended to create
an atmosphere of anxiety, but rather to stimulate
our thinking to become more of an economy of self-reliance
than US-reliant. It is purely a strategic input that
will foster future economic certainty and ultimately
higher standard of living for our citizens, cultivated
by our competitive advantage rather than a checklist
advantage.
Decades ago, our Federation was a major player in
the export of cotton and sugar. Recently the Federal
government has abandoned the harvesting of sugar and
substituted this for a tourist attraction train ride.
It is true that over the years our sugar industry
has seen constant decreasing economies of scale, but
rather than looking ahead with effective consultations
of restoring growth and profits within that industry,
we chose to once again be more reliant on tourism.
Look at the impact that the global economy currently
has on that decision, then, consider the effects of
constant jobs growth and global recognition had we
figure out a solution that would have embraced efficient
production and essentially economies of scale. After
all, people need sugar the world over, regardless
of race, religion, etc.
We have spent millions of dollars on advertising
campaigns that should one way or the other induce
North American citizens to visit our heavenly paradise.
Brilliant, as the additional dollar spent on advertising
brought consistent revenue growth. This, however,
is untrue in the uncertain economic times that presently
surround us.
With that in mind, however, our notion of depending
on tourism as the primary driving force that facilitates
our economy should be looked at as more a major player
of the past and we should seek other opportunities
whether through some service medium or through other
manufacturing capabilities that can support our GDP
and ultimately our citizens.
See my complete government recommendations with complete
data analysis in the continuation of this article
called Economic Crisis Part II.
|