| In last weekend's edition
of your newspaper, we presented the Guatemala Declaration.
This was an output of the XXV General Assembly of the
Inter-American Conference of Social Security; and we
were represented at that Assembly by Deputy Board Chairman,
Stanley Franks, Board member Ms Myrna Liburd and Director,
Mrs. Sephlin Lawrence. With such a high level delegation,
it is fair to say that St Kitts-Nevis not only helped
to craft the document, but has also endorsed the principles
contained. So what exactly does this declaration mean
for us and for Social Security systems worldwide?
Readers would have
noticed the mention of Social Security system as an
anti-poverty measure and as a buffer against economic
and financial crises. In some ways, this is a re-affirmation
of our purpose and a broadening of it.
When our Social Security
[and its predecessors] started, it replaced an ad
hoc system that was based on female fecundity, fertility
and massa's goodwill. That is to say, the more chidren
you had, the bigger your extended family, the kinder
the master, the better off you were likely to be when
you could no longer work. As such, the initial focus
was on reducing individual poverty - people poverty
if you wish. Eventually, that type of poverty of the
1970's - the excessive pan handling - was ameliorated;
and as the reserves of the Fund built up, it was viewed
more as a financial institution than as a social institution.
Poverty is still with
us, but it has changed; largely, it has become hidden,
exposed by crises such as those we have recently witnessed.
As such, the Declaration brings us back full circle,
to focus on national (and even global) poverty; and
calls on us to create or re-create 'safety nets' to
buffer our economies in times of crisis. We are called
upon to make interventions that keep people in work
or to keep people in funds or both. This, in part,
explains our current discussions on Health Insurance
and Unemployment Benefit. It also helps to justify
our continued investments in the infrastructural and
human resource of our country. I must also warn that
it does not allow us to become a cash cow to be milked
dry and put back out to pasture!
Notice too, the use
of phrases like 'decent work', economic productivity',
'safe and healthy working environment'. To my mind,
these are calls for consideration to be given to a
"softer" approach in the workplace in times
like these. Instead of terminating many workers simultaneously,
it may be advisable to place as many workers as possible
on reduced hours. Termination can be disastrous, especially
when it is swift and sudden. Some of the trauma associated
with job loss can be lessened by a well funded, well
supported, well governed Social Security Fund.
The new culture of
Social Security places emphasis on prevention rather
than on damage control. It asserts that it would be
far better to have preventive interventions rather
than those which deal with the fall out from events.
This type of thinking suggests that wellness ought
to be encouraged and even rewarded even as sickness
benefit continues to be made available. Safety in
the workplace, ergonomics, social clubs, fitness centers
are being encouraged in today's workplace.
The new culture also
identifies education and training as critical tools
in the fight against the forces that generate financial
and economic crises.
Clearly, there is
a move amongst international organizations and countries
towards cooperation rather than competition. This
means that aid will probably shrink even more than
it has already. Self reliance therefore will assume
greater and greater significance. If you were a national
of a metropolitan country, struggling to survive,
how would you respond to having your reserves being
sent overseas to countries whose 'national savings'
under Social Security represents so much of their
GDP? I would argue that with reserves of more than
a billion dollars and with a 34 year contribution
yield of roughly $890 million, there has to be greater
reliance on ourselves and less on external support.
The honeymoon is over, and has been for a long time.
(By the way, about $380million has been paid out in
benefits over the 34 years).
The Guatemala Declaration
allows us to place emphasis on the here-and-now needs
of the country, rather than the hereafter needs. It
heightens our corporate responsibilities even as it
accepts that individual needs are important. In fulfilling
both, our economies would be better protected from
external shocks. Do you understand why it is so important
to fund national development?
The Guatemala Declaration
makes me realize that our Social Security has been
on the right path for some time now. I am also re-assured
that the proposals that have emerged through our Reform
Project will augur well for the future. I take great
comfort from that and so should you.
Be prepared to celebrate
Social Security week with us during the last week
of April.
|