|
My wisdom horizon was drastically
expanded recently through participation in two exercises.
One was held here in St Kitts and the other was held
in Canada. Both of them were centered on safety.
The local exercise focused on the
anti-poverty programme of the Federation and the role
of Social Security in this campaign. The presenters
stated that in 2008, 24.5% and 19.9% of households
in St. Kitts & in Nevis respectively were vulnerable
to poverty. This translated to 37.8% and 28.8% of
individuals. The nation spent $20 million or 1.6%
of its Gross Domestic Product to help these individuals.
This then is the safety net: an assistance programme
designed to assist the neediest amongst us, and to
help or prevent citizens from falling through "the
cracks" of society.
I learnt that 9% of that safety net
is contributed by Social Security through our anti-poverty
measure, the $250.00 per month that is paid as an
Old Age Assistance pension. This money relieves 37%
of poverty line of those in St. Kitts and 28% of those
in Nevis, and is the single largest component of the
safety net of the Federation. Ten percent of all elderly
persons, or 511 of them - as of December 31, 2008
- received this monthly money. Payment to these persons
in 2008 alone was EC$1,337,095.
This is one of those benefits from
Social Security which people either love or love to
hate - there is little middle ground on it. Those
who argue against it say that persons who did not
contribute to Social Security should not be paid by
Social Security. These persons may take comfort from
the data from 2003 to 2008 which showed a decline
of these recipients from 703 to 511, a decline of
over 27%. There was a corresponding 20% decline in
the payments, from EC$1,666,614 to the EC$1,337,095
stated earlier.
Those who need it - and those who
get it - sing its praises and are very thankful. For
the period stated, there were 182 new awardees, 108
women, and 74 men, some as old as 90 years. Should
we really allow our elderly to suffer? Especially
our women folk?
There are other aspects to our poverty
alleviation obligation too, but that discussion will
be held in abeyance for now.
My northern exposure, to Canada, exposed
me to occupational health and safety issues.
The sessions that I attended examined the aging brain
with a view to teaching it new, safer, habits; risk
assessment; lessons from a pandemic that can be applied
to the workplace; reporting procedures for "little"
slips; and construction issues. There were also general
sessions with keynote speakers and stalls where suppliers
exhibited the latest in health and safety facilities.
I came away with two major lessons.
Although a workplace has an obligation to provide
a healthy and safe workplace, the ultimate provider
must be the employee. The best way to ensure health
and safety in the workplace is for workers to know
their rights, and quietly but firmly assert them.
Health and safety in the workplace is a culture that
must be developed and adhered to: legislation can
only go so far. Workers in the tropics have no excuse
of discomfort as a reason for not using safety equipment:
through research, appropriate equipment have been
developed for tropical areas.
"Accidents are preventable"
one speaker declared. The two largest components of
avoidance are knowledge and alertness, and all we
can do at Social Security is encourage workers to
be vigilant since we do not have an enforcement mandate.
Furthermore, if we accept that accidents are preventable,
then we must also accept that the 895 claims that
gave rise to the EC$1,228,103 payment (the largest
pay-out of the 2003/2008 period) of 2008 could have
been prevented.
Two Herman Miller quotes from one
of the exhibition booths have stayed with me: "my
nose is like an hour hand on a clock, it should always
be pointed between 3 & 4 o'clock, not above 3
o'clock nor below 4 o'clock"; and "my body's
rest and recovery cycle is like a 20 minute hour glass
- it needs 3 short breaks an hour to nourish and refresh
itself". I think those quotes speak for themselves.
Fatigue kills!
Safety and safety nets!
(Some data is taken from the 2003 -2008 Statistical
Digest, available for purchase from the Social Security
Board)
|