 |
|
VAT Consultation
Officials
|
| |
Based on inferences made at a recent
Value Added Tax (VAT) consultation, the rate for the
new consumption-based tax could be as high as 19 or
20 percent on the cost of the goods or services.
Minister of Finance, Prime Minister Hon. Dr. Denzil
Douglas chaired the meeting attended by various private
and public sector stakeholders.
Financial Secretary Janet Harris gave the public its
first inkling as to a proposed VAT rate when she said
it would likely be higher than the average regional
rate of 16%.
"We have had a study conducted on the VAT rate
and we are awaiting the formal report but u must tell
you that in the region, the VAT rate is averaging
16 percent; it moves between maybe 15and 21 percent.
The recommendation is that we should go higher than
the average rate," she announced.
She explained that in countries where a 15% VAT rate,
it was projected that their government revenues would
be significantly impacted in 2010 and 2011 and as
such St. Kitts-Nevis should learn from that formula.
"From what is taking place, if you look at the
falloff in our revenues in 2009 and the first quarter
of 2010 then we have to evaluate the situation and
see what is a realistic rate at which the implementation
of the VAT would be revenue-neutral. I'm not even
talking about making a contribution to debt service;
I'm speaking about making the introduction of this
tax revenue neutral so that we don't lose any revenue,"
she said.
Harris went on to inform that if a compliance rate
of between 80 and 90 percent could be achieved, then
a lower rate of VAT could be considered.
"If we are going to have everybody on board and
the businesses when they collect the government tax
they're not going to hold it and keep it in their
coffers and use it, but they are going to turn it
over to the Inland Revenue Department so that we can
use it to support the government's budget, then we
may be able to get away with having a lower rate.
But if based on past experiences with other taxes
if the compliance rate is going to be 50 percent then
of course we have to look at the higher rate."
The Financial Secretary was challenged about figures
relating projected future revenues under VAT but she
refused to indicate what rate was used in those calculations.
Hotel and Tourism Association Manager Michael Head
again raised the issue of a special rate for the hotel
and restaurant industry and an April 2011 implementation
date for the sector as opposed to the national November
1, 2010 date.
"The hotel industry is in a serious state with
average occupancies for 2009 showing 31.6 percent.
At this time ,with no hope of recovery until at least
late 2011 the very last thing we would need is a tax
that would increase the price to our consumer,"
he said. Head added that the introduction of VAT after
hotels had already contracted rooms at the pre-VAT
rate would leave the hotels to bear the burden of
the difference in price and that would be disastrous.
"We would therefore ask that VAT be implemented
on the first of April 2011 when the season would be
finished."
Harris said the hotel industry was not the only sector
suffering financially based on the current global
economic crisis.
"Not only is the Tourism sector suffering but
all our revenues are down. We do not want our tourism
sector to be non competitive, it is not going to benefit
anyone of us so we are looking very carefully at that
rate to make sure that what we do with respect to
this sector continues to enhance and helps us to grow
the sector."
Representatives from the manufacturing, retail, and
finance sectors also raised issues regarding existing
stock, hire purchase and enforcement of punitive measures
for tax-related offences.
Prime Minister Douglas asked the more than 200-member
audience what they thought the VAT should be implemented
at. After the majority resoundingly said 15 to 16
percent, the PM asked for a reaction to a VAT rate
of 19-20%. He also referenced this figure when explaining
how the cost of goods and services would not increase
under VAT as it would replace the existing consumption
tax of about 22%.
"Remember we are looking at 19 or 20 percent
and consumption tax is about 21.5%," he said.
Dr. Douglas noted that although the VAT White Paper
had already been drafted, it represented proposed
legislation which was subject to change following
the consultative period.
|